For Cal State Channel Islands’ first two decades, enrollment growth had been steady and reliable with thousands of new students and families attracted to our campus – the only four-year public university in Ventura County. But the higher education landscape has changed significantly in recent years, impacted by economic, demographic, political, and societal shifts.

For the past five years, our budgeted expenses have consistently outpaced our budgeted income. While we have been able to reduce the overall impact in our actual numbers – initially through Covid (via the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund) funding and later through budget cuts across the institution, we have nevertheless been forced to dip into our economic uncertainty reserve funds each year since the 2022-23 academic year. This recurring gap can no longer, nor in good faith, be considered a temporary budget shortfall, but a structural deficit that will be further exacerbated by significant State budget cuts going into effect this year.

The following charts reflect these challenges. The first chart shows our budget each year from 2020-21 and projected through 2027-28. It includes one-time expenses and revenues as well as the latest guidance from the CSU. The red dotted line shows the increase in projected expenses if we had not completed the workforce reduction plan. The new red solid line shows the projected expenses based on the recent reduction in employees as well as updated projections since the May Revision.

This chart displays budgeted revenue and expenses from fiscal year 2020–21 through 2027–28. It visually illustrates a growing gap between expenses and revenue over time, reflecting an increasing budget deficit. • Y-axis: Represents dollar amounts ranging from $120 million to $155 million in $5 million increments. • X-axis: Lists fiscal years from 2020–21 to 2027–28. • Two lines are shown: o A red dotted line labeled "Budgeted Expenses" rises over time, indicating increasing expenses. o A blue dotted line labeled "Budgeted Revenue" shows a modest rise until 2022–23, then generally declines. Budgeted Deficit: • The area between the two lines is shaded light gray and labeled "Budgeted Deficit". • Deficit values are labeled at each year as follows: o 2020–21: -3M  o 2021–22: -1M o 2022–23: -4M o 2023–24: -9M o 2024–25: -11M o 2025–26: -12M o 2026–27: -16M o 2027–28: -20M

This second chart demonstrates that even with the expense reductions we were able to find across the institution, our actual expenses outpaced our actual revenue by just over $5M in 2022-23 and 2023-24 and is expected to do so again this year by $5.7M. Even though the workforce reduction did reduce expenses by $10.4M, the impact on the deficit is less for a number of reasons including 1) the costs for the early retirement and early exit program continuing into next year; 2) there are increases in other mandatory costs, including salary and benefits; and 3) the graduating class of ‘25 was larger than the incoming class, reducing overall tuition revenue.

This line chart compares actual expenses and actual revenue from fiscal years 2020–21 to 2024–25. It indicates a recurring deficit over these years, where expenses exceed revenue. • X-Axis (Horizontal): Fiscal years labeled from 2020–21 through 2027–28. Data points are only shown from 2020–21 through 2024–25. • Y-Axis (Vertical): Financial values ranging from 120M to 150M, in increments of 5 million dollars. Data Series: 1. Actual Revenue (Blue Line): o 2020–21: ~$133M o 2021–22: ~$139M o 2022–23: ~$139M o 2023–24: ~$138M o 2024–25: ~$139.5M 2. Actual Expenses (Red Line): o 2020–21: ~$121M o 2021–22: ~$133M o 2022–23: ~$144.1M o 2023–24: ~$143M o 2024–25: ~$145.2M Annotations: • "ACTUAL DEFICIT" is noted in grey text on the right: o 2022/23: ($5.1M) o 2023/24: ($5.1M) o 2024/25: ($5.7M)Enrollment Impacts

As evidenced by the CSU Enrollment Dashboard, over the past five years Cal State Channel Islands has experienced a 35% drop in Full-Time Equivalent Student (FTES) enrollment. Further, retention rates of just over 71% for first-year students are not where we want them to be. Today, we enroll just over 4,000 FTES compared to a peak of more than 6,400 in 2019.

This chart displays enrollment figures (measured in FTES - Full-Time Equivalent Students) and retention rates from 2014 to 2024. X-Axis (Horizontal): Years from 2014 to 2024 Y-Axis (Left, Vertical): FTES, ranging from 0 to 7,000 Y-Axis (Right, Vertical): Retention Rate, ranging from 66.0% to 84.0% Data Summary: • FTES (red bars): o 2014: 5,179 o 2015: 5,449 o 2016: 5,817 o 2017: 6,186 o 2018: 6,277 o 2019: 6,406 (peak) o 2020: 6,195 o 2021: 5,581 o 2022: 4,768 o 2023: 4,386 o 2024: 4,154 • Retention Rate (gray line): o Rose from around 78% in 2014 to a peak of over 82% in 2015. o Declined gradually through 2018. o Spiked to about 83% in 2019. o Dropped sharply after 2020, reaching approximately 72% by 2022 and remaining stable through 2024.Only 35% of students admitted to Cal State Channel Islands end up enrolling here and many of the other admitted first-year students choose other CSUs. Recruitment and retention are areas of focus as we work to change this pattern.

The image is a flow chart showing the distribution of admitted students from California State University Channel Islands (CSUCI). It illustrates where students go after being admitted. The flow is broken into four branches with corresponding percentages and logos. It shows that the majority of admitted students choose other institutions: 1. Other CSUs (California State Universities): 39% represented by CSU logo 2. Channel Islands: 35% represented by CSUCI logo 3. California Community Colleges: 18% represented by California Community Colleges logo. 4. University of California: 8% represented by University of California logo in

Cal State Channel Islands sees more admitted first-year students enroll elsewhere in the CSU system than any other campus – likely a result of the shared application, which lets students apply broadly at no extra cost, even to campuses that may not be their first choice.

This graphic visually communicates the top 5 destinations for students admitted to CSU Channel Islands (CSUCI).  Ranked Destinations (from left to right): 1. California State University, Northridge (CSUN) Logo 2. California State University, Channel Islands (CSUCI) Logo 3. California State University, Los Angeles (Cal State LA) Logo 4. California State University, Long Beach (CSULB) Logo 5. University of California, Santa Cruz (UC Santa Cruz) LogoThis drop in enrollment impacts us in two important ways:

  1. Directly Through Reduced Tuition & Fees: Although not to the same extent as private colleges, our institution, like many, is dependent on the revenue that we receive from tuition and fees, and 
  2. Indirectly Through a Resident Target Reallocation Cut: Beginning in 2024-25, the CSU altered its approach to enrollment target-setting and resource allocation. Campuses experiencing enrollment declines will have a percentage of their resources reallocated to universities that are reaching or exceeding enrollment targets.  

General Fund Allocation

Support from the state is unpredictable and is subject to change. Beyond the known deferral of increases promised by the “Compact,” we expect significant state budget cuts will go into effect this year. Our current budget planning anticipates an approximate cut of 3% to our General Fund Allocation, as referenced in Governor Newsom’s May Revise. This amount has not yet been formalized by the State Legislature, which has until midnight on June 15 to pass its budget bill for the next fiscal year.   

Increasing Costs

At the same time that revenues are decreasing, we are also experiencing rising costs, which highlights the importance of strategic financial planning. For the 2025-26 school year, we are budgeting “mandatory costs” such as increases in salaries, benefits, property and liability, and compliance requirements to increase by approximately 3.7% which contribute to a $12M budget shortfall – the gap between our projected revenues and expenditures.

This image is a pie chart illustrating the 2025–26 Budget allocation. It is divided into four segments with different colors representing specific budget categories and amounts: 1. Compensation Funded – This is the largest section, shown in blue, representing $110 million. It takes up the majority of the chart. 2. General Operating – Shown in light gray, this segment represents $15 million. 3. Financial Aid – Colored in dark navy blue, this portion accounts for $10 million. 4. Unfunded – Displayed in red, this section represents $12 million, indicating a budget shortfall or unmet funding needs.At CI, increasing cost pressure is exacerbated by characteristics that are unique to our institution, even amongst our peer institutions. Based on work at the system level that has been underway for more than two years to assess the costs of instruction, academic supports, student services, and institutional operations, we are an outlier in the CSU System. For example, we spend approximately $12,851 – or 61% – more per full-time equivalent student compared to the systemwide average, and $2,701 more per FTES when compared to the average of the smallest universities in the system.

This image is a visual comparison of average expenses per Full-Time Equivalent Student (FTES) between the CSU average and CSUCI (California State University Channel Islands).  It shows that CSUCI spends significantly more per FTES compared to the average across all CSU campuses — about $9,781 more per student. • Left Side: "EXPENSES FTES CSU AVERAGE $24,193" is depicted by a gray human figure next to 13 gray dollar signs ($). • Right Side: "EXPENSES FTES CSUCI $33,974" is depicted by a red human figure next to 18 green dollar signs ($).

Likewise, our student-to-faculty and student-to-employee (i.e., faculty, staff, and administrator) ratios are significantly lower than other CSU campuses.

This image is a comparison of student-to-staff ratios between CSU system averages and Channel Islands (CSUCI) in three categories: Tenure Track Faculty, All Faculty, and Employees. It uses illustrated icons of people and students to visually represent these ratios. It shows that Channel Islands (CSUCI) has higher student-to-staff ratios in all categories compared to the CSU system average, suggesting a heavier student load per faculty/employee at CSUCI. Top Row – CSU Averages (Gray Figures): 1. Student: Tenure Track Faculty shows one faculty figure with 26.3 student icons. 2. Student: All Faculty shows one faculty figure with 20.4 student icons. 3. Student: Employee shows one employee figure with 14.9 student icons. Bottom Row – Channel Islands (CSUCI) (Red Figures): 1. Student: Tenure Track Faculty shows one faculty figure with 27.2 student icons (higher than CSU average). 2. Student: All Faculty shows one faculty figure with 21.6 student icons (higher than CSU average). 3. Student: Employee shows one employee figure with 18.2 student icons (higher than CSU average).Simply put, Cal State Channel Islands is spending more money and allocating more resources per student than other CSU campuses. While the intention is admirable, focusing on this distinction may not be the most effective way to support our campus’s growth and success. In reality, it keeps us operating at a deficit and from the perspective of the CSU System, reveals Cal State Channel Islands as an outlier that needs to bring expenses back in line with peer schools of similar size and regional focus.  

Compensation

Salary and benefits routinely account for over 80% of our expenses and have been increasing. Last year, just 11% went to operating expenses and 6% to support financial aid. As a result, when it becomes necessary to reduce expenses, the available options are limited, underscoring the need for thoughtful prioritization.

This vertical bar chart presents annual expenses by category from the 2020–21 fiscal year through the 2027–28 budgeted fiscal year. It emphasizes rising compensation costs over time and slightly declining or flat revenue in later years. Each bar is divided into three stacked sections representing: • Compensation (red) • General Operating Expenses (light gray) • Financial Aid (dark blue) A blue line overlays the chart to represent total revenue across the same time period. Key Details: • The Y-axis shows the monetary amount in millions (M), ranging from 0M to 160M. • The X-axis lists the fiscal years from 2020–21 to 2027–28, with years 2025–26 through 2027–28 labeled as "BUDGETED". • Each bar segment includes a percentage label indicating the proportion of total expenses it represents for that year. Expense Trends: • Compensation is consistently the largest expense category, ranging from 72.3% in 2021–22 to a peak of 83.3% in 2025–26. • General Operating Expenses peaked at 22.5% in 2021–22, then decreased over time to 11.5% by 2027–28. • Financial Aid remains relatively steady, ranging between 5.2% and 7.5% from 2020–21 to 2024–25, slightly decreasing to 6.3% by 2027–28. • Total Revenue (blue line) generally increases until 2023–24, then levels off or slightly decreases.

Diminishing Reserve Funds

Since the 2020-21 academic year, our budgeted expenses have exceeded our budgeted revenue. This became an actual deficit in 2022-23. As a result, each year since we have needed to tap into our economic uncertainty reserve funds. The equivalent of a family’s “rainy day” savings, our economic uncertainty reserve is intended not to be a year over year source of funding but as a hedge against economic uncertainty. Based on expert recommendations, this fund should hold between three- and six-months’ operating budget. 

We shared our concerns earlier this year that were we to continue on the current trajectory without taking action, our reserve fund would have fallen not just below the recommended holdings but precariously close to the minimum 5% of operating budget required by CSU policy for the 2026-27 fiscal year, meaning there would not be sufficient funds to fully cover any deficit.

Although we were able to significantly reduce our anticipated deficit this year through our community’s cost-saving actions, we are still projecting a deficit of almost $5.7M reducing our economic uncertainty reserve to approximately $21.7M – below the expert recommended level. 

On top of that, state funding reductions – even the recently revised ones – still have us tracking to nearly deplete our reserves in the 2026-27 academic year. The chart below reflects the situation if no additional steps are taken. 

This is a vertical bar chart showing the "Reserves Available" from fiscal year 2020–21 through 2027–28. The Y-axis represents monetary values ranging from $9 million to $39 million. Each bar corresponds to a specific fiscal year, with the X-axis labeled accordingly. It highlights a significant decline in available reserves over time.  • 2020–21: $39 million • 2021–22: $39 million • 2022–23: $37 million  • 2023–24: $23 million  • 2024–25: $22 million (projected) • 2025–26: $22.5 million (projected) • 2026–27: $18 million (projected) • 2027–28: $9 million (projected)

 

We are committed to providing our community the most accurate, precise, and up-to-date financial information available. This is a fluid situation, however, that will not be settled until the enactment of the state budget in July. As the situation changes, we pledge to provide updated information.

Back to Top ↑
©